Math 361 X1
Exam 2 Study Guide
Friday, April 4, 12 - 1 pm, 260 MEB
Rules
Calculators/books/notes:
Calculators will not be needed for this exam, they would be distraction
and are therefore not allowed.
You can and should leave answers in "raw" form - e.g., leave binomial
coefficients unevaluated except in the simplest cases, or leave numerical
answers, such as 6/Pi^2, unevaluated. Books or notes are not allowed.
(There is no need for a normal table in this exam, as the normal
distribution will not come up.)
Grading:
After scoring the exam, I will set a curve by specifying cutoffs for
A's, B's, etc. The cutoffs depend on the
distribution of scores, but I do not try
to achieve predetermined percentages of A's, B's, etc.
This allows for some flexibility by giving, for instance, no F's,
or more than the "proper" share of F's.
Once the exam has been graded and the scores have been entered into the
computer grading system, you can access your scores
online, at the following web site:
https://www-s.math.uiuc.edu.edu/bluestem/grades.cgi.
Exam content
The exam will be on the material covered since the last exam through
Friday before the break, namely Chapter 3 in the
Pitman text except for Section 3.3, and combinatorial probabilities
(see the separate handouts on this material). I may spent part of
Monday's (3/31) class to work out some additional problems on 3.4/3.5.
I will begin Section 3.3 (normal approximation) before the
exam, but this section will not be on the exam. A more detailed
syllabus is given below.
General advice
- Read the problem carefully (several times over) to make sure that you
completely understand what the problem is about. Try to rephrase, in
your own language, what the problem asks for.
There will be no trick problems on the exam, and all problems can be solved
with the information given in the problem, and are stated as
unambiguously as possible. In cases where
a problem seems to have several different interpretations,
there is only one interpretation under which the
problem makes good sense as a problem,
while all other interpretations are implausible or contrived.
If you are not certain about the proper interpretation, go through
the possible alternatives and ask yourself in each case whether this is
the intended interpretation; usually, a clear winner will emerge.
- If your solutions appears to be too simple to be true, it probably
is, and chances are that you are missing a subtle, but essential, point.
It is unlikely that a problem can be completely
solved by a single formula. For example, I would not ask for a joint
distribution if it were a simple matter of multiplying two given
individual distributions.
- If you get entangled in lengthy computations, you are likely on
the wrong track.
All exam problems have a simple solution that takes no more than a
couple of lines and does not require messy computations.
Brute force approaches are almost always counterproductive,
they waste valuable time, and in most cases will not lead to the right
answer anyway. You will not be given extra time to complete a brute
force approach if a simpler alternative method is available.
You should leave
final answers in raw form, such as (171/4) + (27/4)2,
or in terms of
binomial coefficients or factorials; trying to work
out numerical answers will not earn you additional credit, and makes
the grading more difficult.
- Most problems on the exam will be of a familiar type.
Since the number of different types of problems on the exam material
is quite limited, most exam problems will be mathematically similar
to problems you have encountered before, such as class examples or
homework problems. Try to spot such similarities, but also be on the
lookout for small but significant differences; for example,
don't try to blindly apply the method for the birthday problem, just
because a problem involves the word birthday.
The best preparation for the exam (in addition to memorizing
relevant definitions, rules, and formulas) is to study
the HW problems and class examples.
- Write-up of solutions.
As usual, you need to show your work; an answer alone is insufficient.
A formal definition of Omega and A as sets is in most cases
unnecessary, but in combinatorial problems, you need to indicate how you
arrived at each component in your answer. E.g., if the answer is
(8.6.4.2.2)/(8)5, you should say how you arrived
at of the factors in the numerator 8, 6, etc., and the numerator
(8)5.
Exam content
- Combinatorial Probabilities:
Some material can be found in
Section 2.5 and Appendix 1 of the Pitman text, but for the most part you
should base your preparations on class notes (and the class summaries on the
course web page), and the supplementary handouts that were
distributed in class. This material is largely problem-oriented, and
the best preparation consists in
working examples and problems like those in class,
in the HW assignments, or on the supplementary handout.
The main topics are combinations (unordered samples);
permutations (ordered samples); and box/ball type problems.
- 3.1: Random variables; Introduction:
For this material, and 3.2 (Expectations), you can follow closely the
excellent presentation in the Pitman text.
You can skip p.141 (bottom) - 143.
You should know the basic definitions and formulas
(distribution, joint distribution,
marginal distributions, independence - see p. 145, 151, 154, and the
formula summary on p. 248), and know how to work with these concepts.
You can skip the parts on
conditional distributions and symmetry, from p. 150 through the end of
the section.
Most problems in this section fall into the following two distinct
types:
- (I) Given a description
of the random variable(s), find its distribution (or joint
distribution).
Problems of this type boil
down to classical probability computations of the
type done in Chapters 1 and 2. In order to do these problems,
you need to be familiar with the methods introduced in those chapters.
If a problem asks for a distribution,
be sure to include the range.
- (II) Given a
distribution of a r.v, (or a joint distribution of two r.v.'s),
compute probabilities involving these r.v.'s.
These problems can be
solved in a systematic way, by
writing the probability asked for as a sum over individual probabilities
P(X=x) (or P(x,y)=P(X=x,Y=y)), where the summation condition mirrors the condition
on X and Y in the probability sought, then using the known information
about the values (or ranges) for x (or x and y) to reduce this abstract
summation to a concrete sum over specific values of x and y, and finally
substituting the (given) probabilities (P(X=x) or P(x,y)) into this
formula.
You should also be familiar with the basic concepts and definitions
of this section, such as distribution, joint distribution, marginal
distribution, and independence, and you should be prepared for problems
involving these concepts.
- 3.2: Expectation of random variables.
Here again, the Pitman text serves as an excellent guide.
Read this section, except for
the part "Expectation and prediction" on p. 178 - 179.
There are three main ways to compute the expectation of a r.v.
(i) A direct computation from the distribution,
using the formula (definition) of E(X), and the values of P(X=x) given
in the distribution.
If the distribution is given or easy to compute, this is usually the
best approach.
(ii) Use properties of E(X) (such as the
addition formula, or the product formula for independent r.v.'s)
(see p. 181 for a summary of these properties).
(iii) The indicator method. This method works only for
a particular type of r.v. X, namely when X is the number of events
Ai that
occur, but when the method does apply, it often provides a relatively easy
way to compute expectations that would otherwise be (near) impossible to
compute. The key to applying the method is to identify (define)
the events Ai.
- 3.4/3.5 Discrete distributions:
In 3.4, skip Examples 3 (moments), and 5 (Collector's problem).
From 3.5, only the definition of the Poisson distribution is required.
You can skip the parts on skew-normal approximation and random scatter.
Important distributions: From the distribution summary on p. 476,
you should know the formulas for the probabilities P(X=k) and the
expectations of the
uniform, binomial, geometric (on {1,2,...}), and Poisson distributions.
The formulas for variances are less important and harder to memorize,
and the only distribution for which you should know the variance is the
binomial distribution.
- Chapter 3 Summary, p. 248 - 249:
You need to know the formulas and definitions
on the first page (p. 248), and the properties of expectation summarized
on p. 181.
- Chapters 1 and 2:
Many problems involving random variables boil down to probability
computations of the type that have come up in Chapters 1 and 2, such as
S/F probabilities, birthday type problems, sampling problems (e.g.,
lottery), and you should (still) know how to do such problems.
If you are a bit rusty, be sure to review this material.
Back to the Math 361 Homepage
Last modified Sat 29 Mar 2003 01:09:29 PM CST