Originator: Zsolt Tuza, Duffus&Hanson (presented by Oleg Pikhurko - REGS 2010)
Definitions: A k-graph is a k-uniform hypergraph; 2-uniform hypergraphs are ordinary graphs. A k-graph G is F-saturated if G does not contain F as a subgraph but the addition of any missing edge to G violates this property. Let sat(n,F) be the minimum size of an F-saturated k-graph with n vertices. It is known that sat(n,F)=O(nk-1) (as shown by Kaszonyi and Tuza (1986) when k=2 and by Pikhurko (1999) when k>2). The reader is referred to the survey [FFS] for more details.
For specific problems on F-saturated 2-graphs, see 2009 REGS problem.Conjecture 1 (Tuza [T1]): For every graph F the ratio sat(n,F)/n tends to a limit as n tends to infinity.
Comments: This conjecture is false if one allows families of forbidden k-graphs instead of just a single k-graph, even when k=2. An example found by Kostochka and Pikhurko is the family consisting of (1) two copies of K4 with one edge joining them, (2) two copies of K4 sharing one vertex, and (3) K2∨(K2+K1) (this contains K4 plus a vertex of degree 2).
Conjecture 2 (Tuza [T2]): If a 3-graph has an edge D such that no other edge of F intersects D in more than one vertex, then sat(n,F)=O(n).
Comments: Tuza made a more general conjecture; this is the first open case. If the assumption on F is false, then sat(n,F)-function grows as Ω(n2). Also, it is easy to show that if F has an isolated edge, then sat(n,F)=O(1); otherwise sat(n,F)=Ω(n). Thus if the conjecture is true, then the order of growth of sat(n,F) for a 3-graph F is always a multiple of ni with i∈{0,1,2}, which would be a very nice result.
We mention one saturation problem for ordinary graphs. Let sat(n,F,d) be the minimum size of a saturated graph on n vertices that has minimum degree at least d. Trivially, sat(n,K3,1)=n-1 and sat(n,K3,d)≤d(n-d) (just consider the complete bipartite graph Kd,n-d). Duffus & Hanson [DH] showed that sat(n,K3,2)=2n-5 for n≥5 and sat(n,K3,3)=3n-15 for n≥10. Alon, Erdos, Holzman and Krivelevich [AEHK] showed that sat(n,K3,3)=dn+o(n) for each fixed d.
Question 3 (Bollobas, 1995): Is it true for every fixed integer d that sat(n,K3,d)=dn+O(1)?
References:
[AEHK] Alon, Noga; Erdős, Paul; Holzman, Ron; Krivelevich, Michael: On
k-saturated graphs with restrictions on the degrees. J. Graph Theory
23 (1996), no. 1, 1-20.
[DH] Duffus, D. A.; Hanson, D.; Minimal $k$-saturated and color critical graphs
of prescribed minimum degree. J. Graph Theory 10 (1986), no. 1, 55-67.
[FFS] Jill Faudree, Ralph Faudree and John Schmitt, A Survey of Minimum
Saturated Graphs and Hypergraphs. Available from
John Schmitt's
webpage.
[T1] Zs. Tuza, Extremal problems on saturated graphs and hypergraphs, Ars
Combinatoria 25B (1988), 105-113.
[T2]
Zs. Tuza, Asymptotic growth of sparse saturated structures is locally
determined, Discrete Math. 108 (1992), 397-402.